Trapster 5.0 arrives on iOS; saves you from expensive tickets
Source: http://www.zdnet.com/trapster-5-0-arrives-on-ios-saves-you-from-expensive-tickets-7000000647/
Source: http://www.zdnet.com/trapster-5-0-arrives-on-ios-saves-you-from-expensive-tickets-7000000647/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/cmlSQODmyRs/watch2.html
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/_0ct6om4Gq4/profile2.html
Tax Treatment of Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Benefits is brought to you by Canadian Capitalist -- Helping you to invest & prosper.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ccapitalist/~3/yOVMzFYNrBI/
Filed under: Retirement, Investing, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs , Morgan Stanley , Bank of America, Citigroup

Wall Street's big banks paid out an astounding $156 billion last year in salaries, bonuses, and benefits.
While this trend is startling, it's not one unique to Wall Street.
In fact, according to Callan Associates, Americans who have the option of buying employer stock in their 401(k) plan have an average of 13.4% of their retirement assets in their company's stock.
Have We All Forgotten Enron? The decision of whether to invest in your own company's stock is difficult because you'd like for your daily work to impact the growth of your savings. You're familiar with your employer, which also breeds confidence.But when your income is tied to a company and your investments are also entwined, one bad quarter or year and both your job and savings could be gone.
Which is what happened to Enron employees following the company's 2001 collapse -- and Jim Carrey's character Dick Harper in the 2005 movie Fun With Dick and Jane after his company, Globodyne, suffered a similar fate.
How to Be Smarter Than Wall Street Employees
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/07/19/why-wall-street-workers-are-worse-investors-than-main-street/
This morning Warren Buffet's company Berkshire Hathaway announced that it was buying Burlington Northern Santa Fe in a deal valued at $44 billion. In the announcement, Buffett called the purchase an "all-in wager on the economic future of the United States."
Is Buffett right that a bet on Burlington Northern is a bet on the economic future of the U.S.? Because if Buffett is right, we've got real problems.
Let's take a look at what Burlington Northern carries. Its major freight revenues (as of 2008) come from coal (23% of revenues); agricultural products (20%); international intermodal shipments of consumer products, which is probably mostly imports (16%); construction and building products (14%); and petroleum products (4%).
In essence, Buffett is betting that the next ten years will look a lot like the last ten: A lot of growth in imports, construction, energy and agricultural products. If he thought that innovation was going to be the driver of the next ten years--biotech, energy, and infotech--he wouldn't be buying Burlington Northern.
I'm not saying that Buffett is wrong. His skepticism about the tech sector in the late 1990s, and innovation in general, turned out to be right on the mark. Berkshire Hathaway stock over the past decade has risen by 84%, whil the S&P 500 is down by 18%.
But his "all-in wager on the economic future of the United States" paints a remarkably gloomy picture of where we are heading.
Source: http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/economicsunbound/archives/2009/11/what_does_buffe.html
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/SIMWnLu_l4s/profile.html
Filed under: Retirement, Investing
401(k) plans can be extremely useful tools to help you save for retirement. Lately, though, they've come under fire because of their high and often hard-to-figure-out fees and their limited investment options, which turn what should be a smart savings vehicle into one that robs employees of their investment returns.
For instance, revenue-sharing arrangements under which mutual fund companies collect fees from fund shareholders and then divert some of the fee income to plan service providers can boost the total fees that 401(k) participants pay. Moreover, because these fees are usually charged on a percentage basis, they get larger as workers save more -- even though the services provided typically remain the same.
The study referred to one employer that actually paid record-keeping fees that were 16 times greater than it believed it was paying, because it didn't understand its revenue-sharing arrangement with its services provider. In addition, some investment options, such as variable annuities and other insurance products, come with additional expenses that add to the fee burden. Moreover, the smaller the employer, the more likely it is you'll pay higher fees. The GAO cited figures from BrightScope saying that plans with less than $10 million in assets pay 1.9% annually for 401(k)-related services, compared to just 1.08% for plans with more than $100 million. So if you work for a tiny company, you can expect your 401(k) choices to be more expensive.
Who Really Pays the Tab Unfortunately, the main reason employers don't know about the fees their plans incur is that they tend not to pay them. Not only do workers pay fund management costs from their investments, but service providers often take record-keeping and administrative fees directly from plan assets as well.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/06/14/your-boss-doesnt-understand-your-401-k-plans-fees-either/
Filed under: Economy, Investing, Credit, Currency
The European debt crisis is back in the headlines, and the news is not good. Portugal's prime minister resigned after his austerity plan for the beleaguered nation were rejected by opposition parties in parliament, and Germany's leadership is waffling on funding the huge bailouts needed by debt-burdened countries such as Ireland and Greece, reflecting the deep ambiguity of German voters weary of bailing out their weaker neighbors. Despite the brave talk of a few months ago, it now seems all but inevitable that Portugal will also need a gigantic bailout of at least 70 billion euros, or $99 billion.
Eurozone growth is already anemic: France managed a meager 0.3% gain in the fourth quarter of 2010, and 1.5% for all of 2010, while the U.S. economy expanded 3.1% in late 2010.
The bailouts are not small potatoes. The temporary rescue fund, known as the European Financial Stability Facility, is currently set at 250 billion euros ($353.6 billion) , and European Union officials want to expand it to 440 billion euros ($622.3 billion). The wealthier nations of Europe have already loaned 177 billion euros ($250.3 billion) to bail out Greece and Ireland, and the high yields on those nations bonds and credit default swaps -- insurance against default -- show that investors continue to see a high risk of default.Spain Also at Risk
While Spain's economy expanded at a modest 0.9% pace last year, its debt situation remains precarious enough that ratings agency Moody's recently downgraded its bonds. The basic problems of Spain will be familiar to Americans: A property bubble drove residential real estate prices to unrealistic heights, and lenders made loans based on those sky-high valuations. Once home prices retreated, banks were left with large quantities of defaults on land and houses.
Analysts are now suggesting Spanish banks will need at least 50 billion euros in additional capital ($70.7 billion) to cover these mounting losses.
As if these losses weren't troubling enough, rising interest rates threaten to further undermine Spain's homeowners. The European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet recently said that the ECB's key interest rate could rise from 1% as early as April. Fully 97% of Spain's home loans are variable-rate: Their payments will rise when interest rates click higher.Despite an unemployment rate around 20% and its recent debt downgrades, mainstream analysts see Spain as an unlikely candidate for a costly bailout. But Spain is burdened with the costs of bailing out its own banks, and other analysts are not so sanguine, citing a lack of information on the quality of assets held by the banks. In other words, some fear Spanish banks are overstating the value of their real estate holdings to hide the full extent of their losses.
Structural Flaws in the European Union Papered OverWhile there is plenty of chatter about bailouts, austerity measures and heavy debt loads, few analysts are speaking to the potentially fatal weakness built into the European Union and its single currency, the euro, a flaw that is now painfully obvious.
While the European Union consolidated power over the shared currency and trade, it left control over trade deficits and budget deficits entirely in the hands of the member states. Lip service was paid to fiscal responsibility via caps on deficit spending, but in the real world, there were no meaningful controls limiting private or state credit expansion, or on sovereign borrowing and spending.
In effect, the importing nations within the union (Ireland, Greece, Portugal and to a degree, Spain and Italy) were given the solid credit ratings and expansive credit limits of their exporting cousins such as Germany, The Netherlands and France. To make a real-world analogy, it's as if a spendthrift younger brother was handed a no-limit credit card with a low interest rate, backed by a guarantee from a sober, cash-rich and credit-averse older sibling.
For awhile, it was highly profitable for the big European and international banks to expand lending to these eager new borrowers. This led to over-consumption by the importing nations and handsome profits for big Eurozone banks. And while the real estate and credit bubble lasted, the citizens of the bubble economies enjoyed the consumerist dream of borrow and spend today, and pay the debts tomorrow.
Tomorrow has arrived, but the foundation of the banks' assets -- the market value of housing -- has eroded to the point that both banks and homeowners face insolvency. The heightened risk of default, both by banks and the governments trying to bail them out, has caused interest rates in the debt-burdened countries to rise. Faced with rising costs of servicing their debts, and spending cuts to bring deficits under control, the citizens of the states such as Portugal are rebelling against austerity measures. On the other side, taxpayers and voters in fiscally sound member states such as Finland and Germany are rebelling about being saddled with the costs of bailing out their weaker neighbors.
This structural imbalance will not be easily addressed, but until it's fixed, the E.U. and the euro, are at risk of a great political and fiscal fracturing.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/03/27/why-the-european-debt-crisis-is-far-from-over/